Best Online Travel Guides

11 Kids Sue YouTuber’s Mom, Alleging Abuse, Exploitation

  • Eleven former members of Piper Rockelle’s “Piper Squad” are suing the teenager’s mom.
  • The defendants are accused of bodily, emotional, verbal, and sexual abuse, the swimsuit alleges.
  • The lawsuit additionally alleges Tiffany Smith was sexually inappropriate with youngsters. 

Something is loading.

Eleven youngsters who had been previously members of the YouTuber Piper Rockelle’s “Piper Squad” are suing the teenager star’s mother and her boyfriend, alleging bodily, emotional, verbal, and sexual abuse, in addition to monetary exploitation, in line with courtroom paperwork.

The youngsters filed the swimsuit within the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, on Wednesday, alleging that Piper’s mom and her boyfriend did not pay them for video appearances, made sexually express feedback about them, and tried to sabotage their YouTube channels after they stopped collaborating with Piper, in line with the grievance.

They are in search of compensatory and punitive damages, the price of legal professional charges, and some other simply reduction allowed beneath California regulation.


Piper is a 14-year-old YouTube star whose channel has greater than 8.8 million subscribers. Internet critics have questioned the appropriateness of her content material for years, and the singer Pink accused her mother and father of exploiting her in August after Piper posted YouTube movies and Instagram pictures during which she posed in a bikini.

Piper’s mom, Tiffany Smith, instructed Insider she needed to “defend” her daughter in an emailed assertion on the time.

The lawsuit alleges Piper’s mom earned a popularity throughout the “Piper Squad” as a “mean-spirited management freak” whose actions towards the kids had been “not solely sexually inappropriate and confrontational, however typically reprehensible and even unlawful.”

Tiffany Smith


Tiffany Smith in a June video on Piper’s channel.

Screenshot/YouTube – Piper Rockelle

The swimsuit says Smith would typically “verbally harass” and yell on the youngsters if she felt they had been doing one thing incorrect in a video. It provides that triggered a lot of them to interrupt down in tears or be despatched house to their households.

Smith and Hunter Hill, her boyfriend, are additionally accused of not paying the kid stars for appearances in a whole lot of movies for Piper’s YouTube channel, which collectively span 1000’s of hours of labor, the swimsuit alleges. Court paperwork say Piper’s YouTube channel grew considerably after the 11 different youngsters started making appearances in her movies.


Smith, Hill, Piper, and Piper’s supervisor didn’t reply to requests for remark.

Matthew Sarelson, the plaintiffs’ legal professional, instructed Insider that “perhaps each single factor that we have alleged has been corroborated by different eyewitnesses, together with eyewitnesses who are usually not plaintiffs on this lawsuit.”  

The swimsuit alleges Tiffany Smith was sexually inappropriate with youngsters

That swimsuit alleges Smith made “wildly offensive and sexually express feedback” to the kids and accuses her of asking one youngster in the event that they thought one other youngster “has a bunch of freckles on his dick.”

“(*11*) would continuously hear Ms. Smith refer to a different Squad member’s penis as ‘Dwayne the Rock Hard Johnson,'” the lawsuit says.

The grievance alleges one woman accompanied Smith when she went to the put up workplace to mail a few of Piper’s used underwear to “an unknown particular person” and remarked to the woman that “previous males prefer to odor these items.”

The swimsuit says Smith would continuously pair the kids up as pseudo “crushes” for the aim of video content material and alleges she gave them “very sexually express directions” about tips on how to act with one another and what to put on on digicam. It alleges that ladies had been instructed to put on “brief skirts and low lower tops” and that boys had been instructed to put on “tight-fitting denims” or sweatpants to point out off their “bulges.”

“Ms. Smith would typically boast to (*11*) and others about being the ‘Madam of YouTube’ and a ‘Pimp of YouTube’ and that she ‘makes kiddie porn,'” the lawsuit says.

Smith is accused within the swimsuit of inappropriately touching a number of younger ladies on their legs and spanking them and poking their “anuses via their clothes.” 

The swimsuit additionally accuses Smith of rubbing one woman’s “uncovered thighs and shifting her hand towards her vagina” quite a few instances, in addition to commenting on the scale of her breasts and “trying to squeeze them.”

The grievance alleges she tried “to spit” in the identical woman’s “mouth and on her face” and accuses her of “taking a picket spoon and smacking” her physique with it.

Sarelson stated “there is a very robust probability that among the issues had been really caught on digicam” since there are “perhaps 1000’s of hours, collectively, of videotape that was made as a part of the manufacturing course of.”

Sarelson added they anticipated to achieve entry to the cameras in the course of the discovery technique of the lawsuit.

Smith and Hill ‘tanked’ different channels, lawsuit alleges

The swimsuit says Smith and Hill engaged in “a wide range of soiled ways” towards the plaintiffs’ YouTube channels after they left the Piper Squad.

It alleges these ways included utilizing “bots” so as to add and take away subscribers to have an effect on their positions in YouTube’s suggestion algorithm, falsely flagging their movies as “inappropriate,” and embedding a few of their movies on porn websites to get their movies restricted on YouTube.

Smith can also be accused within the doc of typically telling Hill to “tank” the plaintiffs’ YouTube channels. As a results of the interference, the swimsuit alleges, the plaintiffs misplaced numerous subscribers and viewers, in addition to an enormous quantity of income.

The lawsuit additionally says the plaintiffs all instantly skilled a serious decline in subscribers, views, and income upon leaving the squad.

“When you take a look at the analytics that YouTube supplies,” Sarelson stated, “there is a demonstrable drop-off in viewership and subscriptions, which in the end leads to much less income, for our shoppers as soon as they disassociate from the squad.”

The plaintiffs are in search of compensatory and particular damages in an quantity at least what they are saying they collectively misplaced in income after leaving the squad, which the swimsuit alleges is no less than $2 million. They’re additionally in search of punitive damages and damages over allegations of extreme emotional misery, grief, and humiliation.

Show More

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button