Analysis-Modi’s farm reform reversal to deter investment in India’s agriculture By Reuters

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Farmers collect to mark the primary anniversary of their protests on the outskirts of Delhi at Pakora Chowk close to Tikri border, India, November 26, 2021. REUTERS/Anushree Fadnavis

By Mayank Bhardwaj and Rajendra Jadhav

NEW DELHI (Reuters) – India’s repeal of agriculture legal guidelines geared toward deregulating produce markets will starve its huge farm sector of much-needed personal investment and saddle the federal government with budget-sapping subsidies for years, economists mentioned.

Late final yr, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s authorities launched three legal guidelines meant to open up agriculture markets to corporations and appeal to personal investment, triggering India’s longest-running protest by farmers who mentioned the reforms would enable firms to exploit them.


With a watch on a essential election in populous Uttar Pradesh state early subsequent yr, Modi agreed to rescind the legal guidelines in November, hoping to clean relations with the highly effective farm foyer which sustains practically half the nation’s 1.3 billion individuals and accounts for about 15% of the $2.7 trillion financial system.

But by shelving probably the most bold overhaul in a long time, Modi’s backtracking now seemingly guidelines out much-needed upgrades of the creaky post-harvest provide chain to reduce wastage, spur crop diversification, and enhance farmers’ incomes, economists mentioned.

“This will not be good for agriculture, this isn’t good for India,” mentioned Gautam Chikermane, a senior economist and vp at New Delhi-based Observer Research Foundation.

“All incentives to shift in direction of a extra environment friendly, market-linked system (in agriculture) have been smothered.”


The u-turn does allay farmers’ fears of dropping the minimal worth system for primary crops, which growers say ensures India’s grain self-sufficiency.

“It seems the federal government realised that there is benefit in the farmers’ argument that opening up the sector would make them weak to massive corporations, hammer commodities costs and hit farmers’ earnings,” mentioned Devinder Sharma, a farm coverage knowledgeable who has supported the growers’ motion. 

But the gruelling year-long standoff additionally means no political celebration will try any related reforms for at the very least a quarter-century, Chikermane mentioned.

And, in the absence of personal investment, “inefficiencies in the system will proceed to ship wastage and meals will proceed to rot,” he warned.



India ranks 101 out of 116 international locations on the Global Hunger Index, with malnutrition accounting for 68% of kid deaths.

Yet it wastes round 67 million tonnes of meals yearly, value about $12.25 billion – practically 5 instances that of most massive economies – in accordance to varied research.

Inadequate cold-chain storage, shortages of refrigerated vans and inadequate meals processing amenities are the principle causes of waste.

The farm legal guidelines promised to enable personal merchants, retailers and meals processors to purchase straight from farmers, bypassing greater than 7,000 government-regulated wholesale markets the place middlemen’s commissions and market charges add to client prices.

Ending the rule that meals should circulate by way of the accepted markets would have inspired personal participation in the availability chain, giving each Indian and world corporations incentives to make investments in the sector, merchants and economists mentioned.

“The agriculture legal guidelines would have eliminated the largest obstacle to large-scale purchases of farm items by large firms,” mentioned Harish Galipelli, director at ILA Commodities India Pvt Ltd, which trades farm items. “And that might have inspired firms to carry investment to revamp and modernise the entire meals provide chain.”

Galipelli’s agency will now have to re-evaluate its plans.

“We have had plans to scale up our enterprise,” mentioned Galipelli. “We would have expanded had the legal guidelines stayed.”

Other corporations specialising in warehousing, meals processing and buying and selling are additionally anticipated to evaluation their growth methods, he mentioned.


Poor post-harvest dealing with of produce additionally causes costs of perishables to yo-yo in India. Only three months in the past, farmers dumped tomatoes on the street as costs crashed, however now customers are paying a steep 100 rupees ($1.34) a kg.

The legal guidelines would have helped the $34 billion meals processing sector develop exponentially, in accordance to the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII), an trade group.

Demand for vegatables and fruits would have gone up. And that might have reduce surplus rice and wheat output, slicing bulging shares of the staples value billions of {dollars} in state warehouses, economists mentioned.

“Crop diversification would even have helped rein in subsidy spending and slender the fiscal deficit,” mentioned Sandip Das, a New Delhi-based researcher and farm coverage analyst.

Food Corporation of India (FCI), the state crop procurement company, racked up a document 3.81 trillion rupees ($51.83 billion) in debt by final fiscal yr, alarming policymakers and inflating the nation’s meals subsidy invoice to a document 5.25 trillion rupees ($70.16 billion) in the yr to March 2021.

However, whereas the federal authorities now has restricted scope for change, native authorities “can go for reforms offered they’ve the political will to accomplish that,” mentioned Bidisha Ganguly, an economist at CII.

Similarly, enterprise capital-funded startups have additionally expressed curiosity in India’s agriculture sector.

“Agritech, whether it is allowed to take root, has the potential to allow a greater handshake of farmers and customers by way of their technological platforms,” Chikermane mentioned.

(1 = 74.83 rupees)

Show More

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button