DC Attorney General Sues Proud Boys, Oath Keepers

A protester who declared himself to be a member of the Proud Boys, center, seen here amid other Donald Trump supporters outside the Capitol on Jan. 6.

A protester who declared himself to be a member of the Proud Boys, middle, seen right here amid different Donald Trump supporters exterior the Capitol on Jan. 6.Photo: Alex Edelman / AFP (Getty Images)

DC Attorney General Karl Racine has filed a federal civil lawsuit concentrating on two far-right teams concerned within the Jan. 6 Capitol riots, the road brawling “Western chauvinist” Proud Boys and wannabe vigilante group the Oath Keepers, accusing them of conspiring to stop the peaceable switch of energy from Donald Trump’s administration to Joe Biden’s.

The involvement of each teams within the failed rebellion has been extensively documented—over 20 Proud boys together with key members like Joe Biggs and Ethan Nordean and nearly as many Oath Keepers confronted arrest and/or federal fees in relation to the incident. Racine is counting on the identical regulation cited in a lawsuit towards the organizers of the lethal fascist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia in 2017, the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, components of which defend authorities officers finishing up their duties (resembling conspiracies to overthrow the federal authorities) and permit lawsuits towards individuals engaged in conspiracies to deprive others of their civil rights.


The Charlottesville case was partially victorious—whereas jurors dominated towards the plaintiffs on the KKK Act claims, they nailed the organizers for $26 million on different claims. But because the Washington Post noted, whereas there are clear similarities such because the reliance on backlogs of digital proof, Racine’s go well with differs considerably as a result of it comes from a authorities actor.

The objective of the lawsuit, Racine instructed the Post, is to unravel how the 2 teams are financed and safe “full restitution and recompense” for the DC authorities, which is on the hook for medical prices to scores of officers overwhelmed by rioters. Racine instructed the paper, “I think the damages are substantial. If it so happens that it bankrupts or puts these individuals and entities in financial peril, so be it.”

“As the independent attorney general, I have the responsibility to enforce our laws and hold these violent defendants accountable,” Racine mentioned throughout a press convention on Wednesday, based on the Wall Street Journal. “… We filed this suit to seek justice for the brave men and women of the Metropolitan Police Department.”

According to the Journal, the town of DC has estimated that ongoing medical prices for most of the 850 Metropolitan Police Department officers mobilized to reply to the assault on the Capitol runs into the thousands and thousands. Racine’s go well with seeks compensatory, statutory, and punitive damages towards the named teams and members. The Anti-Defamation League and the States United Democracy Center helped Racine’s workplace assemble the lawsuit.


“Last month’s victory in Charlottesville court sent a clear message of the major financial, operational, and legal consequences for violent extremism,” Amy Spitalnick, government director of Integrity First for America, which represented plaintiffs within the Charlottesville go well with, instructed Gizmodo in an announcement. “We know that civil lawsuits have the potential to bankrupt and dismantle hate groups and their leadership — and help prevent them from striking again. There’s so much work ahead. Kudos to Attorney General Racine and all of his partners in this important effort.”

Racine declined to inform the Post whether or not he had mentioned the go well with with officers from the Department of Justice, which is presently pursuing federal fees towards each one of many dozens of defendants apart from Proud Boys chief Enrique Tarrio (he was in jail on Jan. 6). However, it’s clear the case depends closely on proof that has already been dug up amid the federal investigation into the rebellion, together with affidavits from prison circumstances and a trove of digital proof like textual content messages and social media histories.

“Over the course of several weeks, the Proud Boys, the Oath Keepers, their leadership, and certain of their members and affiliates—motivated by a desire to overturn the legal results of the election and initiate a second term of Donald Trump’s presidency—worked together to plot, publicize, recruit for, and finance their planned attack,” the lawsuit states. “The result of that planning, the January 6th Attack on the Capitol, was not a protest or a rally. It was a coordinated act of domestic terrorism.”

Later, the lawsuit states: “The Defendants used social media and electronic messaging platforms to coordinate the Attack, including by recruiting individuals to participate in the Attack, promoting strategic tactics for use in the Attack, coordinating collection and distribution of tactical gear and weapons, and planning and organizing travel for themselves and their co-conspirators. These efforts began well before January 6th.”


Members of the Oath Keepers, which types itself as a militia group, face a number of the most critical prison fees stemming from the assault, according to NPR. While a number of the group’s members breached the Capitol inside on Jan. 6, its chief Stewart Rhodes will not be accused of doing so, however of coordinating with members earlier than and whereas they went in. Prosecutors have principally charged Proud Boys with members with instigating the mob and coordinating the assault, NPR separately reported, however some face fees of assaulting, resisting, or impeding officers. One member named within the DC go well with, William Chrestman, is charged with threatening “to assault, kidnap, and murder a federal law enforcement officer.”

A transcript of a phone call obtained by prosecutors confirmed that after the assault, Chrestman allegedly boasted he “stormed the Capitol Building, we rushed that shit, we took that house back… me and two others, we were the first ones through the gate.” Chrestman additionally allegedly boasted of assaulting an officer and claimed to have “started a revolution” by sparking efforts to breach the fences across the Capitol.

“Unlike others whose violence was either more spontaneous or associations more informal, the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers were allegedly far more organized and premeditated with respect to their illegal conduct,” Brian Levin, a professor of prison justice and director of the Center for the Study of Hate & Extremism at California State University, San Bernardino, instructed Gizmodo.

As the Post famous, just a few Proud Boys or Oath Keepers have pleaded responsible and are cooperating with the federal government. The Proud Boys, for instance, have largely used the protection that their preparations for battle had been towards left-wing counterprotesters (even supposing the one organized opposition to the MAGA crowd on Jan. 6 was the police and safety forces on the Capitol).

Jonathon Mosley, a lawyer who represents Philadelphia Proud Boys chief Zachary Rehl and Oath Keeper Kelly Meggs, instructed the Post the go well with was going after the mistaken culprits: “You can’t file a fantasy in court. There were clearly violent people who assaulted police that day, but that wasn’t the Proud Boys or the Oath Keepers.”

Steven Gardiner, Research Director at Political Research Associates, instructed Gizmodo that whereas members of each teams stormed the Capitol, they did in order a part of a much more expansive anti-democratic motion on the far proper. He particularly pointed to research by the University of Chicago Project on Security and Threats displaying these arrested in connection within the assault seemed to be a part of a disturbingly broad mass motion largely centered round conspiracy theories like QAnon or the Great Replacement (which claims whites are being systematically changed by racial and ethnic minorities) that bears distinct variations from earlier patterns of right-wing extremism. One instance is that the insurrectionists on Jan. 6 had been largely comprised of middle-aged Americans within the skilled class, reasonably than the kind of youthful, disaffected male stereotypically related to fringe teams.

“These kinds of lawsuits have been used in a few high profile cases, for example the judgement against neo-nazi Tom Metzger in the 1990s over the murder of Mulegeta Seraw by racist skinheads who had been influenced by Metzger,” Gardiner instructed Gizmodo. “The result can effectively shut down organizations and marginalize leaders. This is a legitimate use of the legal system and I think AG Racine is justified in pursuing it.”

“However, it’s important not to look at lawsuits of this sort—or even criminal prosecution—as a kind of magic bullet that will end white nationalism or anti-democratic political violence,” Gardiner added. “Most of those involved in the storming of the Capitol were not Proud Boys or Oath Keepers, or any other defined group. There were part of the much larger MAGA movement mobilized primarily by then-President Trump and his supporters and enablers in Congress.”

“Unfortunately, because today’s extremist landscape is both diversified, fractured and often less hierarchal, the threat today involves not only groups like these, but also others who dine from an a la carte extremism buffet,” Levin instructed Gizmodo. He added that motion is “also frequently targeting not only national governance, but increasingly state and local fora as well.”

Show More

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button