The Ravens practically accomplished a 14-point fourth-quarter comeback in opposition to the Packers. They got here up only a level quick due to a late threat that they took.
After Tyler Huntley scored a landing to minimize the Packers’ lead to 31-30, coach John Harbaugh made the choice to go for 2. The conversion failed, as Huntley could not join with Mark Andrews on a cross to the entrance proper pylon.
The Ravens had to try an onside kick because of the convert’s failure, however the Packers recovered it with 43 seconds left to seal a 31-30 win.
MORE: Breaking down the success price for 2-point conversions vs. further factors
The defeat, which dropped the Ravens out of the AFC North lead and out of the playoff image all collectively, left some Ravens followers with a key query. Why did Harbaugh go for 2 in that spot?
“I thought our chances of winning there was better than overtime,” the veteran coach explained throughout a postgame information convention.
Harbaugh’s resolution should not come as a shock. He did the identical factor two weeks in the past in opposition to the Steelers after Lamar Jackson scored a landing with 12 seconds.
MORE: Ravens’ Tyler Huntley channels Lamar Jackson to practically beat Packers
The Steelers have been main 20-19 however Harbaugh elected to have his group go for 2 and the win. Jackson was unable to join with Andrews on a brief route out of the backfield, and the Ravens misplaced consequently.
Though each conversions failed, Harbaugh nonetheless insists that his selections have been right.
“To me, in each of these instances, that gave us the very best chance to win,” Harbaugh said of making an attempt the two-point tries. “Because we did not win would not make it not true. It’s nonetheless true now, simply as true because it was then. It would not at all times work out.”
Packers coach Matt LaFleur thought the choice was the proper one as effectively, as he defined when requested if he would have completed the identical factor as Harbaugh throughout his postgame information convention.
“If I have been on that sideline, completely,” LaFleur mentioned. “I completely would have [gone for it]. You know, that is what I anticipated. That’s what we anticipated as a training workers that they have been going to go for 2 in the event that they have been to rating. . .positive sufficient they did it.”
NFL PLAYOFF PICTURE: AFC, NFC Wild Card races after Week 15
The numbers appear to point out that Harbaugh’s selection was a bit extra of a coin-flip. ESPN’s Seth Walder identified that there was a “slight lean” on making an attempt an additional level in that spot and that if Harbaugh had actually needed to go for 2, he ought to have completed it whereas the Ravens have been down by eight factors, as they might have had one other chance to convert a two-point attempt had their first one failed.
The error was not going for two down 8.
On the ultimate resolution, we had breakeven % at 51%, which suggests very slight lean towards PAT however can actually go both manner. Close sufficient that elements like accidents are value contemplating.
Harbaugh did make a mistake. But it was on prior TD.
— Seth Walder (@SethWalder) December 20, 2021
But the Ravens aren’t involved with what others are saying. Harbaugh is snug along with his decisions and so are the Ravens gamers.
“That was ‘the’ decision,” Andrews said of the two-point conversion attempt. “Anyone who second-guesses that is wrong.”